The First Council of Nicaea (325 AD)

This page presents the original text alongside a clear modern reading. You can read the original, the modern version, or both—side by side on desktop and stacked on mobile.

You can also turn on Nicene Highlight Mode to see key phrases that help show what was at stake in the council’s confession.

Introduction

Original

This council opened on 19 June in the presence of the emperor, but it is uncertain who presided over the sessions. In the extant lists of bishops present, Ossius of Cordova, and the presbyters Vitus and Vincentius are listed before the other names, but it is more likely that Eustathius of Antioch or Alexander of Alexandria presided. The bold text in the profession of faith of the 318 fathers constitutes, according to Tanner, "The additions made by the council to an underlying form of the creed", and that the underlying creed was most likely "derived from the baptismal formula of Caesarea put forward by the bishop of that city Eusebius" or that it "developed from an original form which existed in Jerusalem or at any rate Palestine". "A direct descent from the creed of Eusebius of Caesarea is manifestly out of the question." The figure of 318 given in the heading below is from Hilary of Poitier and is the traditional one. Other numbers are Eusebius 250, Eustathius of Antioch 270, Athanasius about 300, Gelasius of Cyzicus at more than 300.

Modern Reading

The council opened on June 19 in the presence of the emperor, but it is not certain who presided over the sessions. In the surviving lists of bishops present, Ossius of Cordova and the presbyters Vitus and Vincentius are listed first, but it is more likely that Eustathius of Antioch or Alexander of Alexandria presided.

According to Tanner, the bold text in the profession of faith of the 318 fathers represents additions made by the council to an earlier form of the creed. That earlier creed was most likely derived from the baptismal formula of Caesarea presented by Eusebius, the bishop of that city, or it may have developed from an earlier form that existed in Jerusalem or elsewhere in Palestine.

A direct descent from the creed of Eusebius of Caesarea is unlikely.

The number 318 given in the heading below comes from Hilary of Poitiers and is the traditional number. Other ancient sources give different totals: Eusebius says 250, Eustathius of Antioch says 270, Athanasius says about 300, and Gelasius of Cyzicus says more than 300.

The Profession of Faith of the 318 Fathers

Original

We believe in one God the Father all powerful, maker of all things both seen and unseen.

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the only-begotten begotten from the Father, that is from the substance of the Father, God from God, light from light, true God from true God, begotten not made, consubstantial with the Father, through whom all things came to be, both those in heaven and those in earth; for us humans and for our salvation he came down and became incarnate, became human, suffered and rose up on the third day, went up into the heavens, is coming to judge the living and the dead.

And in the holy Spirit.

Modern Reading

We believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of all things, both visible and invisible.

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the only-begotten, begotten from the Father—that is, from the substance of the Father: God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten not made, of one substance with the Father. Through him all things came to be, both in heaven and on earth.

For us human beings and for our salvation he came down, became incarnate, became truly human, suffered, rose again on the third day, ascended into heaven, and is coming to judge the living and the dead.

And in the Holy Spirit.

The Anathemas

Original

And those who say 1. "there once was when he was not", and "before he was begotten he was not", and that 2. he came to be from things that were not, or from another hypostasis or substance, affirming that the Son of God is subject to change or alteration these the catholic and apostolic church anathematises.

Modern Reading

And those who say, “there once was when he was not,” or “before he was begotten he was not,” or that he came to be from things that did not exist, or from another hypostasis or substance, or who claim that the Son of God is subject to change or alteration—these the catholic and apostolic Church condemns.

Canons 1–5

Original

1. If anyone in sickness has undergone surgery at the hands of physicians or has been castrated by barbarians, let him remain among the clergy. But if anyone in good health has castrated himself, if he is enrolled among the clergy he should be suspended, and in future no such man should be promoted. But, as it is evident that this refers to those who are responsible for the condition and presume to castrate themselves, so too if any have been made eunuchs by barbarians or by their masters, but have been found worthy, the canon admits such men to the clergy.

2. Since, either through necessity or through the importunate demands of certain individuals, there have been many breaches of the church's canon, with the result that men who have recently come from a pagan life to the faith after a short catechumenate have been admitted at once to the spiritual washing, and at the same time as their baptism have been promoted to the episcopate or the presbyterate, it is agreed that it would be well for nothing of the kind to occur in the future. For a catechumen needs time and further probation after baptism, for the apostle's words are clear: "Not a recent convert, or he may be puffed up and fall into the condemnation and the snare of the devil". But if with the passage of time some sin of sensuality is discovered with regard to the person and he is convicted by two or three witnesses, such a one will be suspended from the clergy. If anyone contravenes these regulations, he will be liable to forfeit his clerical status for acting in defiance of this great synod.

3. This great synod absolutely forbids a bishop, presbyter, deacon or any of the clergy to keep a woman who has been brought in to live with him, with the exception of course of his mother or sister or aunt, or of any person who is above suspicion.

4. It is by all means desirable that a bishop should be appointed by all the bishops of the province. But if this is difficult because of some pressing necessity or the length of the journey involved, let at least three come together and perform the ordination, but only after the absent bishops have taken part in the vote and given their written consent. But in each province the right of confirming the proceedings belongs to the metropolitan bishop.

5. Concerning those, whether of the clergy or the laity, who have been excommunicated, the sentence is to be respected by the bishops of each province according to the canon which forbids those expelled by some to be admitted by others. But let an inquiry be held to ascertain whether anyone has been expelled from the community because of pettiness or quarrelsomeness or any such ill nature on the part of the bishop. Accordingly, in order that there may be proper opportunity for inquiry into the matter, it is agreed that it would be well for synods to be held each year in each province twice a year, so that these inquiries may be conducted by all the bishops of the province assembled together, and in this way by general consent those who have offended against their own bishop may be recognised by all to be reasonably excommunicated, until all the bishops in common may decide to pronounce a more lenient sentence on these persons. The synods shall be held at the following times: one before Lent, so that, all pettiness being set aside, the gift offered to God may be unblemished; the second after the season of autumn.

Modern Reading

1. If someone, because of illness, has undergone surgery performed by physicians or has been castrated by barbarians, he may remain among the clergy. But if a healthy man has castrated himself, and he is enrolled among the clergy, he must be suspended, and in the future no such man should be promoted. This refers to those who are responsible for their own condition and deliberately castrate themselves. But if someone has been made a eunuch by barbarians or by his masters and is found worthy, the canon allows such a man to remain among the clergy.

2. Because of necessity or the pressure of certain individuals, there have been many violations of the church’s canon. As a result, men who recently came from pagan life to the faith, after only a short time as catechumens, have been admitted at once to baptism and then promoted to the episcopate or presbyterate. It is agreed that nothing of this kind should happen in the future. A catechumen needs time and further testing after baptism, for the apostle’s words are clear: “Not a recent convert, lest he become proud and fall into the condemnation and snare of the devil.” But if, with the passing of time, some sexual sin is discovered in such a person and he is convicted by two or three witnesses, he must be suspended from the clergy. If anyone goes against these regulations, he will lose his clerical standing for acting against this great synod.

3. This great synod strictly forbids any bishop, presbyter, deacon, or member of the clergy to keep a woman living with him, except his mother, sister, aunt, or any other person who is above suspicion.

4. It is highly desirable that a bishop should be appointed by all the bishops of the province. But if this is difficult because of urgent need or the length of the journey, at least three should come together and perform the ordination, provided the absent bishops also take part in the vote and give their written consent. In each province the right of confirming the proceedings belongs to the metropolitan bishop.

5. Concerning those, whether clergy or laity, who have been excommunicated, the sentence is to be respected by the bishops of each province, according to the canon that forbids those expelled by some from being admitted by others. But an inquiry should be held to determine whether anyone has been expelled because of pettiness, quarrelsomeness, or some other bad temper on the part of the bishop. Therefore, so that there may be proper opportunity to examine such matters, it is agreed that synods should be held twice each year in every province. In this way, all the bishops of the province can meet together and investigate these cases, and those who have offended against their own bishop may be recognized by all to have been reasonably excommunicated, until the bishops together decide to pronounce a more lenient judgment. These synods are to be held at the following times: one before Lent, so that all bitterness may be set aside and the gift offered to God may be pure; and the second after autumn.

Canons 6–10

Original

6. The ancient customs of Egypt, Libya and Pentapolis shall be maintained, according to which the bishop of Alexandria has authority over all these places since a similar custom exists with reference to the bishop of Rome. Similarly in Antioch and the other provinces the prerogatives of the churches are to be preserved. In general the following principle is evident: if anyone is made bishop without the consent of the metropolitan, this great synod determines that such a one shall not be a bishop. If however two or three by reason of personal rivalry dissent from the common vote of all, provided it is reasonable and in accordance with the church's canon, the vote of the majority shall prevail.

7. Since there prevails a custom and ancient tradition to the effect that the bishop of Aelia is to be honoured, let him be granted everything consequent upon this honour, saving the dignity proper to the metropolitan.

8. Concerning those who have given themselves the name of Cathars, and who from time to time come over publicly to the catholic and apostolic church, this holy and great synod decrees that they may remain among the clergy after receiving an imposition of hands. But before all this it is fitting that they give a written undertaking that they will accept and follow the decrees of the catholic church, namely that they will be in communion with those who have entered into a second marriage and with those who have lapsed in time of persecution and for whom a period of penance has been fixed and an occasion for reconciliation allotted, so as in all things to follow the decrees of the catholic and apostolic church. Accordingly, where all the ordained in villages or cities have been found to be men of this kind alone, those who are so found will remain in the clergy in the same rank; but when some come over in places where there is a bishop or presbyter belonging to the catholic church, it is evident that the bishop of the church will hold the bishop's dignity, and that the one given the title and name of bishop among the so-called Cathars will have the rank of presbyter, unless the bishop thinks fit to let him share in the honour of the title. But if this does not meet with his approval, the bishop will provide for him a place as chorepiscopus or presbyter, so as to make his ordinary clerical status evident and so prevent there being two bishops in the city.

9. If any have been promoted presbyters without examination, and then upon investigation have confessed their sins, and if after their confession men have imposed hands upon such people, being moved to act against the canon, the canon does not admit these people, for the catholic church vindicates only what is above reproach.

10. If any have been promoted to ordination through the ignorance of their promoters or even with their connivance, this fact does not prejudice the church's canon; for once discovered they are to be deposed.

Modern Reading

6. The ancient customs of Egypt, Libya, and Pentapolis are to be maintained, according to which the bishop of Alexandria has authority over all these places, since a similar custom exists for the bishop of Rome. Likewise in Antioch and the other provinces, the rights of the churches are to be preserved. In general the following principle is clear: if anyone is made bishop without the consent of the metropolitan, this great synod determines that such a person shall not be a bishop. However, if two or three dissent from the common vote because of personal rivalry, while the common vote is reasonable and in agreement with the church’s canon, the decision of the majority shall prevail.

7. Since there is an established custom and ancient tradition that the bishop of Aelia is to be honored, let him receive all that belongs to this honor, while preserving the dignity that belongs to the metropolitan.

8. Concerning those who call themselves Cathars and who at times return publicly to the catholic and apostolic Church, this holy and great synod decrees that they may remain among the clergy after receiving the laying on of hands. But first it is fitting that they give a written promise that they will accept and follow the decrees of the catholic Church, especially that they will remain in communion with those who have entered a second marriage and with those who lapsed during persecution and for whom a period of penance has been fixed and a way of reconciliation has been given. In all things they are to follow the decrees of the catholic and apostolic Church. Therefore, where all the ordained in villages or cities are found to be men of this kind only, they may remain in the clergy in the same rank. But when some of them come over in places where there is already a bishop or presbyter of the catholic Church, it is clear that the bishop of the Church will keep the bishop’s dignity, and the one who was called bishop among the so-called Cathars will have the rank of presbyter, unless the bishop thinks it good to let him share in the honor of the title. If he does not approve of that, the bishop shall provide him a place as chorepiscopus or presbyter, so that his normal clerical standing is clear and so that there may not be two bishops in one city.

9. If any have been promoted to the presbyterate without examination, and then, when investigated, have confessed their sins, and if after that confession hands have been laid on them by men acting against the canon, the canon does not admit such people, for the catholic Church upholds only what is above reproach.

10. If any have been promoted to ordination through the ignorance of those who promoted them, or even with their knowing approval, this does not weaken the church’s canon; once discovered, they are to be deposed.

Canons 11–14

Original

11. Concerning those who have transgressed without necessity or the confiscation of their property or without danger or anything of this nature, as happened under the tyranny of Licinius, this holy synod decrees that, though they do not deserve leniency, nevertheless they should be treated mercifully. Those therefore among the faithful who genuinely repent shall spend three years among the hearers, for seven years they shall be prostrators, and for two years they shall take part with the people in the prayers, though not in the offering.

12. Those who have been called by grace, have given evidence of first fervour and have cast off their military belts, and afterwards have run back like dogs to their own vomit, so that some have even paid money and recovered their military status by bribes -- such persons shall spend ten years as prostrators after a period of three years as hearers. In every case, however, their disposition and the nature of their penitence should be examined. For those who through their fear and tears and perseverance and good works give evidence of their conversion by deeds and not by outward show, when they have completed their appointed term as hearers, may properly take part in the prayers, and the bishop is competent to decide even more favourably in their regard. But those who have taken the matter lightly, and have thought that the outward form of entering the church is all that is required for their conversion, must complete their term to the full.

13. Concerning the departing, the ancient canon law is still to be maintained namely that those who are departing are not to be deprived of their last, most necessary viaticum. But if one whose life has been despaired of has been admitted to communion and has shared in the offering and is found to be numbered again among the living, he shall be among those who take part in prayer only. But as a general rule, in the case of anyone whatsoever who is departing and seeks to share in the eucharist, the bishop upon examining the matter shall give him a share in the offering.

14. Concerning catechumens who have lapsed, this holy and great synod decrees that, after they have spent three years as hearers only, they shall then be allowed to pray with the catechumens.

Modern Reading

11. Concerning those who sinned without necessity, without the loss of their property, without danger, or without anything of that kind, as happened under the tyranny of Licinius, this holy synod decrees that although they do not deserve leniency, they should still be treated mercifully. Therefore, those among the faithful who truly repent shall spend three years among the hearers, seven years as prostrators, and for two years shall join the people in the prayers, though not in the offering.

12. Those who were called by grace, showed early zeal, and threw off their military belts, but later returned like dogs to their own vomit, so that some even paid money and regained their military position by bribes—such persons shall spend ten years as prostrators after first spending three years as hearers. In every case, however, their attitude and the character of their repentance must be examined. For those who, by fear, tears, perseverance, and good works, show their conversion by deeds and not just in outward form, may properly join in the prayers after they have completed their assigned time as hearers, and the bishop may decide even more favorably in their case. But those who have treated the matter lightly and have thought that merely coming into the church is enough for conversion must complete the full term.

13. Concerning those who are dying, the ancient canon law is still to be kept: those who are departing this life are not to be deprived of their last and most necessary viaticum. But if someone whose life had been despaired of has been admitted to communion and has shared in the offering, and is then found again among the living, he shall be among those who join in prayer only. As a general rule, in the case of anyone who is dying and asks to receive the eucharist, the bishop, after examining the matter, shall give him a share in the offering.

14. Concerning catechumens who have lapsed, this holy and great synod decrees that after they have spent three years as hearers only, they may then pray with the catechumens.

Canons 15–18

Original

15. On account of the great disturbance and the factions which are caused, it is decreed that the custom, if it is found to exist in some parts contrary to the canon, shall be totally suppressed, so that neither bishops nor presbyters nor deacons shall transfer from city to city. If after this decision of this holy and great synod anyone shall attempt such a thing, or shall lend himself to such a proceeding, the arrangement shall be totally annulled, and he shall be restored to the church of which he was ordained bishop or presbyter or deacon.

16. Any presbyters or deacons or in general anyone enrolled in any rank of the clergy who depart from their church recklessly and without the fear of God before their eyes or in ignorance of the church's canon, ought not by any means to be received in another church, but all pressure must be applied to them to induce them to return to their own dioceses, or if they remain it is right that they should be excommunicated. But if anyone dares to steal away one who belongs to another and to ordain him in his church without the consent of the other's own bishop among whose clergy he was enrolled before he departed, the ordination is to be null.

17. Since many enrolled among the clergy have been induced by greed and avarice to forget the sacred text, "who does not put out his money at interest", and to charge one per cent a month on loans, this holy and great synod judges that if any are found after this decision to receive interest by contract or to transact the business in any other way or to charge a flat rate of fifty per cent or in general to devise any other contrivance for the sake of dishonourable gain, they shall be deposed from the clergy and their names struck from the roll.

18. It has come to the attention of this holy and great synod that in some places and cities deacons give communion to presbyters, although neither canon nor custom allows this, namely that those who have no authority to offer should give the body of Christ to those who do offer. Moreover it has become known that some of the deacons now receive the eucharist even before the bishops. All these practices must be suppressed. Deacons must remain within their own limits, knowing that they are the ministers of the bishop and subordinate to the presbyters. Let them receive the eucharist according to their order after the presbyters from the hands of the bishop or the presbyter. Nor shall permission be given for the deacons to sit among the presbyters, for such an arrangement is contrary to the canon and to rank. If anyone refuses to comply even after these decrees, he is to be suspended from the diaconate.

Modern Reading

15. Because of the great disturbance and factions that are caused, it is decreed that the custom—if it is found in some places contrary to the canon—must be completely abolished, so that neither bishops, presbyters, nor deacons may transfer from city to city. If after this decision of this holy and great synod anyone attempts such a thing, or allows himself to be involved in it, the arrangement shall be completely canceled, and he shall be returned to the church in which he was ordained bishop, presbyter, or deacon.

16. Any presbyters or deacons, or in general anyone enrolled in any rank of the clergy, who leave their church recklessly and without the fear of God before their eyes, or in ignorance of the church’s canon, must by no means be received in another church. Every effort should be made to persuade them to return to their own dioceses, or if they remain, they should be excommunicated. But if anyone dares to take away someone who belongs to another bishop and ordain him in his own church without the consent of the bishop under whom he had originally been enrolled, that ordination is null.

17. Since many among the clergy have been led by greed and love of money to forget the sacred text, “who does not put out his money at interest,” and to charge one percent a month on loans, this holy and great synod judges that if anyone is found after this decision to receive interest by contract, or conduct the business in any other way, or charge a flat rate of fifty percent, or devise any other scheme for shameful gain, he shall be deposed from the clergy and his name removed from the roll.

18. It has come to the attention of this holy and great synod that in some places and cities deacons give communion to presbyters, although neither canon nor custom allows this. Those who have no authority to offer the sacrifice should not give the body of Christ to those who do offer it. It has also become known that some deacons now receive the eucharist even before the bishops. All these practices must be stopped. Deacons must remain within their own proper limits, knowing that they are ministers of the bishop and subordinate to the presbyters. Let them receive the eucharist in proper order, after the presbyters, from the hands of the bishop or presbyter. Nor shall deacons be permitted to sit among the presbyters, for that is contrary to canon and order. If anyone refuses to obey even after these decrees, he is to be suspended from the diaconate.

Canons 19–20

Original

19. Concerning the former Paulinists who seek refuge in the catholic church, it is determined that they must be rebaptised unconditionally. Those who in the past have been enrolled among the clergy, if they appear to be blameless and irreproachable, are to be rebaptised and ordained by the bishop of the catholic church. But if on inquiry they are shown to be unsuitable, it is right that they should be deposed. Similarly with regard to deaconesses and all in general whose names have been included in the roll, the same form shall be observed. We refer to deaconesses who have been granted this status, for they do not receive any imposition of hands, so that they are in all respects to be numbered among the laity.

20. Since there are some who kneel on Sunday and during the season of Pentecost, this holy synod decrees that, so that the same observances may be maintained in every diocese, one should offer one's prayers to the Lord standing.

Modern Reading

19. Concerning former Paulinists who come for refuge to the catholic Church, it is decided that they must be rebaptized without exception. Those who in the past were enrolled among the clergy, if they appear to be blameless and above reproach, are to be rebaptized and ordained by the bishop of the catholic Church. But if, after investigation, they are found unsuitable, they should be deposed. The same procedure shall be followed for deaconesses and, in general, for all whose names have been included on the roll. We refer to deaconesses who have been given this status, since they do not receive the laying on of hands and are therefore in every respect to be counted among the laity.

20. Since there are some who kneel on Sunday and during the season of Pentecost, this holy synod decrees that, so that the same practice may be kept in every diocese, prayers should be offered to the Lord while standing.

The Letter of the Synod in Nicaea to the Egyptians

Original

The bishops assembled at Nicaea, who constitute the great and holy synod, greet the church of the Alexandrians, by the grace of God holy and great, and the beloved brethren in Egypt, Libya and Pentapolis. Since the grace of God and the most pious emperor Constantine have called us together from different provinces and cities to constitute the great and holy synod in Nicaea, it seemed absolutely necessary that the holy synod should send you a letter so that you may know what was proposed and discussed, and what was decided and enacted.

First of all the affair of the impiety and lawlessness of Arius and his followers was discussed in the presence of the most pious emperor Constantine. It was unanimously agreed that anathemas should be pronounced against his impious opinion and his blasphemous terms and expressions which he has blasphemously applied to the Son of God, saying "he is from things that are not", and "before he was begotten he was not", and "there once was when he was not", saying too that by his own power the Son of God is capable of evil and goodness, and calling him a creature and a work. Against all this the holy synod pronounced anathemas, and did not allow this impious and abandoned opinion and these blasphemous words even to be heard.

Of that man and the fate which befell him, you have doubtless heard or will hear, lest we should seem to trample upon one who has already received a fitting reward because of his own sin. Such indeed was the power of his impiety that Theonas of Marmarica and Secundus of Ptolemais shared in the consequences, for they too suffered the same fate.

But since, when the grace of God had freed Egypt from this evil and blasphemous opinion, and from the persons who had dared to create a schism and a separation in a people which up to now had lived in peace, there remained the question of the presumption of Meletius and the men whom he had ordained, we shall explain to you, beloved brethren, the synod's decisions on this subject too. The synod was moved to incline towards mildness in its treatment of Meletius for strictly speaking he deserved no mercy. It decreed that that he might remain in his own city without any authority to nominate or ordain, and that he was not to show himself for this purpose in the country or in another city, and that he was to retain the bare name of his office. It was further decreed that those whom he had ordained, when they had been validated by a more spiritual ordination, were to be admitted to communion on condition that they would retain their rank and exercise their ministry, but in every respect were to be second to all the clergy in each diocese and church who had been nominated under our most honoured brother and fellow minister Alexander; they were to have no authority to appoint candidates of their choice or to put forward names or to do anything at all without the consent of the bishop of the catholic church, namely the bishop of those who are under Alexander. But those who by the grace of God and by our prayers have not been detected in any schism, and are spotless in the catholic and apostolic church, are to have authority to appoint and to put forward the names of men of the clergy who are worthy, and in general to do everything according to the law and rule of the church. In the event of the death of any in the church, those who have recently been accepted are thereupon to succeed to the office of the deceased, provided that they appear worthy and are chosen by the people; the bishop of Alexandria is to take part in the vote and confirm the election. This privilege, which has been granted to all others, does not apply to the person of Meletius because of his inveterate seditiousness and his mercurial and rash disposition, lest any authority or responsibility should be given to one who is capable of returning to his seditious practices.

These are the chief and most important decrees as far as concerns Egypt and the most holy church of the Alexandrians. Whatever other canons and decrees were enacted in the presence of our lord and most honoured fellow minister and brother Alexander, he will himself report them to you in greater detail when he comes, for he was himself a leader as well as a participant in the events.

We also send you the good news of the settlement concerning the holy pasch, namely that in answer to your prayers this question also has been resolved. All the brethren in the East who have hitherto followed the Jewish practice will henceforth observe the custom of the Romans and of yourselves and of all of us who from ancient times have kept Easter together with you.

Rejoicing then in these successes and in the common peace and harmony and in the cutting off of all heresy, welcome our fellow minister, your bishop Alexander, with all the greater honour and love. He has made us happy by his presence, and despite his advanced age has undertaken such great labour in order that you too may enjoy peace.

Pray for us all that our decisions may remain secure through almighty God and our lord Jesus Christ in the holy Spirit, to whom is the glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Modern Reading

The bishops assembled at Nicaea, who make up the great and holy synod, send greetings to the church of Alexandria, holy and great by the grace of God, and to the beloved brothers and sisters in Egypt, Libya, and Pentapolis. Since the grace of God and the most pious emperor Constantine have called us together from many provinces and cities to form the great and holy synod at Nicaea, it seemed necessary that the holy synod should send you a letter so that you may know what was proposed and discussed, and what was decided and established.

First of all, the matter of the impiety and lawlessness of Arius and his followers was examined in the presence of the most pious emperor Constantine. It was unanimously agreed that anathemas should be pronounced against his impious opinion and the blasphemous words and expressions he used against the Son of God, saying that “he is from things that are not,” and “before he was begotten he was not,” and “there once was when he was not,” and also saying that by his own power the Son of God is capable of evil and goodness, and calling him a creature and a work. Against all of this the holy synod pronounced anathemas and did not allow this impious and corrupt opinion, or these blasphemous words, even to be heard.

You have no doubt heard, or will hear, about that man and the fate that came upon him, lest we seem to trample on one who has already received a fitting reward for his own sin. Such was the power of his impiety that Theonas of Marmarica and Secundus of Ptolemais shared in its consequences, for they too suffered the same fate.

But since the grace of God had freed Egypt from this evil and blasphemous opinion, and from the persons who dared to create schism and division among a people who until then had lived in peace, there remained the matter of Meletius and the men he had ordained. We now explain to you, beloved brothers and sisters, what the synod decided on this subject as well. The synod was moved to deal mildly with Meletius, though strictly speaking he deserved no mercy. It decreed that he might remain in his own city but without any authority to appoint or ordain, and that he was not to appear for this purpose in the countryside or in another city, but was to keep only the bare name of his office. It was further decreed that those whom he had ordained, after they had been confirmed by a more spiritual ordination, were to be admitted to communion, provided that they retained their rank and exercised their ministry, but in every respect were to be second to all the clergy in each diocese and church who had been appointed under our most honored brother and fellow minister Alexander. They were to have no authority to appoint those they wished, or to submit names, or to do anything at all without the consent of the bishop of the catholic Church, that is, the bishop of those under Alexander. But those who, by the grace of God and through our prayers, have not been found in any schism and remain spotless in the catholic and apostolic Church, are to have authority to appoint and to put forward the names of worthy clergy and, in general, to do everything according to the law and order of the Church. If anyone in the church dies, those recently admitted may succeed to the office of the deceased, provided they appear worthy and are chosen by the people, and provided the bishop of Alexandria takes part in the vote and confirms the election. This privilege, which has been granted to others, does not apply to Meletius himself because of his long-standing rebelliousness and his unstable and reckless character, lest authority or responsibility be given to someone capable of returning to his rebellious practices.

These are the chief and most important decrees concerning Egypt and the most holy church of the Alexandrians. Whatever other canons and decrees were enacted in the presence of our lord and most honored fellow minister and brother Alexander, he himself will report to you in greater detail when he comes, for he was both a leader and a participant in these events.

We also send you the good news that the question concerning the holy Pasch has been settled. In answer to your prayers, this matter too has been resolved. All the brothers and sisters in the East who until now followed the Jewish custom will from now on observe the custom followed by the Romans, by you, and by all of us who from ancient times have kept Easter together with you.

So rejoice in these successes, in the common peace and harmony, and in the cutting off of all heresy, and welcome our fellow minister, your bishop Alexander, with even greater honor and love. He has made us glad by his presence and, despite his advanced age, has undertaken such great labor so that you too may enjoy peace.

Pray for us all, that our decisions may remain secure through almighty God and our Lord Jesus Christ in the Holy Spirit, to whom be glory forever and ever. Amen.

Translation Note

Original

Translation taken from Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, ed. Norman P. Tanner.

Modern Reading

Translation taken from Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, edited by Norman P. Tanner. The modern reading on this page is intended to make the original text easier to read and understand, while staying close to its meaning and flow.

Turn reading into formation

Try This This Week

The council of Nicaea was not only about argument. It was about speaking truthfully about Jesus and learning how the church should live together. Choose one practice and one conversation starter.

1
Read
Notice one phrase that becomes clearer to you.
2
Practice
Let truth move into prayer, humility, and steadiness.
3
Share
Talk with one person about what mattered here.

Practices

Pick one for the week.

  1. Pray one line of the creed each day. Move slowly and let one phrase become prayer.
  2. Stand to pray once this week. Let your posture remind you of resurrection hope.
  3. Practice careful speech. In one conversation, resist sloppy language and speak truthfully and graciously.
  4. Pray for the wider church. Thank God for believers outside your own stream or tradition.
  5. Name what is at stake. Write one sentence: “It matters that Jesus is truly God because _____.”

Conversation Starters

Use these with a friend or group.

  • Why did the church care so much about these exact words for Jesus?
  • What would be lost if Jesus were less than fully divine?
  • How did political peace help the church—and complicate it?
  • What do you notice about how doctrine and church order develop together here?
  • Which phrase from Nicaea feels most important to you right now?

Optional: Invite a Spiritual Friend

Ask one trusted person to help you keep paying attention to what this reading is clarifying.

Consider asking one person to check in with you this week using two questions: “What are you seeing more clearly about Jesus?” and “Why does that matter?”